Noah Thurner vs Leonardo Iemmi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• The recent form shows Noah Thurner winning 43.35% of points on his second serve. Leonardo Iemmi, on the other hand, captures 39.77% in the same category. Could this give Thurner an edge in second serve scenarios? It seems likely.
• In terms of return game, Thurner's recent stats reveal a win of 43.38% on opponents' second serve points, whereas Iemmi excels with 52.90%. For first serve returns, Iemmi again leads with 31.73% compared to Thurner’s 24.28%. Does this signify Iemmi's potential advantage in the return game? Yes, it certainly indicates that.
• Under pressure, Thurner saves 55.10% of breakpoints, slightly trailing behind Iemmi's 61.97% save rate. Could this difference influence the match outcome in crucial moments? Iemmi's higher save rate might be useful here.
• Over the past year, Thurner has a slightly higher match win rate of 53.13% compared to Iemmi's 50.00%. Does this suggest Thurner has been in better form overall? Marginally, it does.
• When considering surface preferences, Thurner performs best on hard courts with a 45% win rate, while Iemmi peaks on indoor hard surfaces with the same win percentage. How might this affect the match depending on the surface? It might favor Iemmi if they play on indoor hard surfaces.
• In terms of competition level, both players have mostly competed at the $10K Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Thurner showing a win rate strength at this tier compared to Iemmi. Is this indicative of Thurner’s experience advantage? Perhaps, but the stats are quite close.
• Quality of opponents marks a substantial difference, as Thurner has faced opponents averaging a rank of 280.22, contrasting with Iemmi's 109.29. Does Iemmi's experience against tougher opponents give him an edge? Likely, yes.
• If the match progresses to a deciding set, Iemmi has a superior track record, winning 38% compared to Thurner’s 25% in such scenarios. Could this be crucial in predicting the outcome? Absolutely, it gives Iemmi a favorable likelihood in lengthy matches.

Editorial Prediction (October 27, 2025, UTC):

Noah Thurner displays competence in his second serve and a marginally better overall match win rate over the past year. However, his breakpoint save rate and average opponent quality fall slightly short when compared to Leonardo Iemmi.

Leonardo Iemmi shines in several critical areas. He possesses a robust return game advantage and performs significantly better against higher-ranked opponents. His ability to save breakpoints also provides a potential edge in tight scenarios.

Therefore, considering Iemmi's strengths against formidable opponents and his decisive set performance, he appears to be the favored contender to win in this upcoming match.